In order to assure the better optimization of the difficult drive you will have to use the defragmentation method that best cases your pc usage & file usage figure. But, as a general rule Stealth and Space are the ones you will most often need as Complete type is more particular.
We tried O and O Defrag professional person capacities versus a 2GB partition, fragmented to the extreme allowing to the first analysis, which read a 98.106 fragmentation degree . We got out it with about 10% of release space (199MB) and continued with Stealth defragmentation.
The app scored an amazing speed as it completed its job in a minute and a one-half, but dealt to lower the fragmentation degree to only 90. Functioning Stealth again altered perfectly nothing, proceeding absolutely no more file. Even another function with the same method added no change at all, therefore we continued to encourage carrying out advance applying the Space defragmentation method.
In this type a little amelioration was showed and twenty-five files were struck, but not all the direction to make them immediate as the atomization degree lowered to only 90. releasing up some space on the trial drive i.e.we increased it to 463MB, e.g. 22% afforded way to improve solutions. First of all, the initial fragmentation level after getting rid of the information was 76.044. And from this measure it dropped to 68.815 with the first Stealth defragment method.
Applying the Space method the outcomes improved importantly, diluting fragment to 46.682. But the astonishing consequences were registered with the first Complete/Name defragmen, which decided fragment to 0.568 by proceeding 1,950 files in the procedure.
Trying the appl on a unlike partition, with 1.8GB of free space out of a entire of about 50GB, showed that it can do a large job in a very short time: it took only 7'33'' to shrink 11.309 degree of fragment to 0.025. still, we were going for perfect optimization so we also extended a Space defragment job.
Ironically, what we thought would add zero defragment caused quite the opposite & aroused the total of fragmentations to a stage of 6.693, in 10'15''. Of course, we directed to adjust the trouble and began a Complete/Name defragmentation procedure, which only aggravated the position, producing the fragment stage to 15.70.
As bad as all the counts sound and even if it affords the notion that the more you attempt to improve difficult cause optimization, the more damage you do, all this is actually a pattern solution afforded that defragmentations for different cases of optimization have been utilized. A new Complete/Name function throughout our trying contributed 0 fragment stage and 100% cause performance in 1h7'33''. And not only stats were beneficial, but the information on that drive really performed improve.
Bottom line is that you should select the fragmentation method that brings best for you and cling to it. If you do not require particular file memory access optimization, then Stealth, furnished that you have plenty release space available, and Space should be enough.