Thread: How much more central processing unit cores having StarCraft II utilization

Later 12 years in growth, you might look StarCraft II to have undergone few serious technical growth and push your Computer to its fixes. Either that or it might appear similar its 12 years elder.


The fact of course is somewhere in among: RTS games never actually stresses a graphics board in the similar way FPS do, but StarCraft II is even a good appearing game. It is not only the graphics processing unit that has function to do: with dozens of units on display and the AI scheming away in the background, the central processing unit does not get off simple.


Later our previous content on the number of cores games require, we determined to see how many central processing unit cores StarCraft II needs.




The game engine utilizes DirectX 9.0c which does natively determine the multi-threading capacity of the graphics-software interface, however it too utilizes Havok physics which is entire central processing units driven. We utilized an Intel Core i7-980X to maximize the core count in build, but we disabled Hyper-threading and power storing states.


A Hyper-threading core is not a 'real' core, it is only a piece of software trickery that opens up 'what's left' of the in build central processing unit pipeline so could simply have made inconsistencies in our tries. We functioned the game fully function from the hard disk - no dumber choice media was necessitated.


We cranked the game up to utilize its complete detail circumstances and fired up a local game (needed for consistent, reportable solution) with 7 other AIs to test and torture the system. We then construct an army and recorded a section with various dozen units on display fighting each other.