Thread: Geforce 9300 GS video card

Good day.

I bought Asus x73 excellent laptop, but I am confused by one thing, decided means Windows Vista to get an assessment of performance and it 3.5 video card GF 9300 GS 512 Mg, other indices of about 5. But I was surprised that the store looked exactly the same performance card for Hp iq512ru, but with 256 Mg of memory, and there was score 4.9, as it can be, because I have the memory twice as much as productivity in the lower.

Can you explain what ambush?

Can be the difference in processors? And the memory card is not always a radical impact on productivity.

Asus
17, 3 "(1600x900) / P8600 (2, 4 GHz) / 3 Gb/ 320Gb / GF9300MG 512Mb / VistaHP

HP
22 "(1680x1050) / P7250 (2.0 GHz) / 4 Gb/ 500Gb / GF9300MGS 256Mb / VistaHP64

In the chipset ambush likely. Asus is most likely on the logic of SiS (M671DX), and HP - Intel GM965. Also because when I compare it to the same specifications of HP and Toshiba, the performance did not significantly differed in favor of notebooks built on SiS. After this entire testing no strings «Performance Tire / chipset», as it directly affects the performance of graphics subsystems.

Like all logic, but there is one "but" about which I was told that the chipset of the chipset are different at 5% in productivity, the difference in the percent in favor of Asus 20%, which is important for productivity and the ambush in another-in memory, t . k. Asus is a plank in 1g +2 G, and it works in single mode, while HP 2G +2 G working.

If so the numbers could run a test and not rely on the program of standard definitions of productivity? Then everything will be seen as it is.

Note that a realistic 22h inch?? Even with 256 provides grants of more than 512 by 17 inch Asus?