Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: How AMD Bulldozer chips look on the solution on benchmarks

  1. #1
    Aba Jakob is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    24
    Rep Power
    0

    Default How AMD Bulldozer chips look on the solution on benchmarks

    New AMD "Bulldozer" chips allegedly on par with the achievement of a arch overclocking arena. If this is absolutely true, again Congratulations huge AMD to try to achieve the head of achievement from Intel. As the Athlon 64 smoked the Pentium 4 in about every benchmark. Bulldozer is there any advertence to aback this up? In addition, chips bulldozer-amateur akin with 8 concrete cores and 16 accoutrement physics. Each amount has brace of CPU modules in them. It agency that AMD's access to hyper-threading should be quicker than Intel's analytic arguments.

  2. #2
    Abarrane Lazar is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    There are lot of ambiguous benchmarks out there, but I absolutely do not familiar. AMD claims that "more than 2 times Ph II X6 1100T" function, but do not accustomed what workload they are speaking about. However, it appears possibly that the CPU 8 amount Nehalem will bout the presentation, which is actual good. Hyperthreading so far I do not anticipate it’s agnate at all. Hyperthreading is a concrete amount and allows you to assignment on two issues as two analytic cores.

  3. #3
    Abba Magdu is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I was acquisitive that addition absolutely had new information. So far all we accept are the aforementioned essentials for three months: Bulldozer is backward and has been delayed several times. Who knows back in actuality they come? AMD is accepting problems with the accomplishment process. No affirmation of performance, but speculations is accident clock-clock of the SB so it uses added cores.

  4. #4
    Abdera Monik is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    24
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Well, I larboard AMD's admirable action out of my annoyer abridgment because it's not applicable. Annoyer = Enthusiast. Currently if you are an enthusiast, you go with Intel. Conveniently for AMD, Enthusiasts are not your accepted computer user. For best users, an AMD Llano belvedere would be perfect. Intel has no ideal aftereffect for the baby banking plan boilerplate user who dabbles in gaming or wants accelerated video playback.

  5. #5
    Abdiel Motes is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    21
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Well, I larboard the admirable action of AMD's my arbitrary of bulldozer, it is not relevant. Annoyer = Enthusiast. Currently, if you are an enthusiast, go with Intel. Conveniently for AMD, is not agog computer user’s standard? For best users, a Llano AMD belvedere would be perfect. Intel does not accept a absolute band-aid for the boilerplate user who dabbles in low-budget amateur or demand accelerated video playback.

Similar Threads

  1. AMD Bulldozer server chips shipped in the first quarter of 2011
    By Aden Oliver in forum Latest Hardware News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-18-2010, 07:08 PM
  2. I used the following benchmarks
    By lynette in forum Motherboards & Memory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-12-2009, 04:55 PM
  3. Benchmarks
    By jasenta in forum Motherboards & Memory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2009, 04:45 PM
  4. Synthetic Benchmarks
    By Garrison Bravo in forum Applications
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-11-2009, 11:34 AM
  5. The interpretation of benchmarks
    By Jarrius Arundel in forum Applications
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-11-2009, 09:59 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SEO by SubmitEdge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48