Thread: AMD speaks about GPU Gaming Physics - possible to transform Computer gaming's unchang

For a brief moment, it once appeared similar hardware-fast gaming physics had the possible to change Computer gaming's static rooms entire of memory crates into dynamic globes complete of lavishing specks, rumpling cloth and realistically collapsing bridges. Co-launched by Manju Hegde, a novel start-up called Ageia ambitiously established its devoted PhysX accelerator; a technology that is just a component of Nvidia's family, and it appeared similar gaming physics was about to fullt overhauled.


Glorious demonstrates have been shown off, cash has been splurged and large hope have been created, but the fact is that really just a handful of Computer games really characteristics hardware-accelerated physics. What is more, those that do, such as Mafia 2, mainly utilize it for particle eye-candy, instead than altering the real game mechanisms.




However, final year Hegde was poached by AMD to bring together the Fusion group, prompting entire plots of speculation about AMD's design for contending with PhysX. Early that, the company had too showed OpenCL-accelerated Havok at GDC 2009, but we have listened small about this since. Only what went wrong with the conception of GPU-accelerated physics, what is AMD doing with Bullet Physics and will GPU physics always acually take off? We caught up with Hegde to examine his thoughts.


'I imagine one of the things I am a little distressed about is that, contempt the awesome amount of concern that we got out of Ageia, and entire the difficult process at Nvidia, physics is even not mainstream,' tells Hegde. 'My entire view in beginning Ageia was to create physics mainstream, so Nvidia has a some PhysX games - I was at Nvidia for a pair of years, and we did receive a some games - but I can say you that it is still not simple to acquire a game developer to utilize physics in a significant path.'