Thread: Norton 2011 your experiences

Prepare just a Samsung laptop for a customer before - Norton is the first down that flies, but, admittedly, is pure habit - there have _all_ again improved and no longer eat as much performance as before. But since free software is not too bad - why buy, ifs but stop once there is why not.

If you key data such as company information, etc it is highly recommended, i care to have none, I move really only trusted sites, but these resources are always bugs me eat, no matter what virus program. my Avast consumed whole 7mb of RAM in use amount in times of 4GB as standard .

Microsoft Security Essentials uses KB RAM 4756 all I think you can just get over the Sun, in NEM Scan 5424 KB ... and also from 0 to 1% CPU load please introduce yourself to not be so.

I am super happy with norton 2011 with adjustment possibilities are there for me too much, as for what the resources and it does not remember me.

Yes, with the consumption of resources, it should properly be said to have improved in Norton, but it was never used, only know McAfee been at S478er Celeron to throw up slowly. I liked it, but cant license was limited to only one year, now MS Security Essentials, i also like good nerves, not like Avira and Co., in tests it cuts off not too bad. 'll Probably stay there.


And, if you are not staying on dubious sites and watching something then, should a computer without AV are not easily compromised, after all the viruses are written not only on the OS but also for the Avs.