Thread: ATI Sapphire Radeon hard disk repel 4870 512mb freaking.

I establish a game. Wow , It campaigns all one minute to break .. and there, ptits squares look on display (explosions style hash browns) ... everything freezes (from time to time I accept a content from the VPU ATI says "3D acceleration has been stopped), but most of the time: Black Display, PC freezes, and reboot mandatory. Accept you any idea? Thank you in encourage for your assist.

For me, the pass by ATI and 2D/3D profile redacting comes along to work (1 hour of play minus trouble cons generally five minutes. The only drawback, must I activate the profiles manually since the auto detect my 2D/3D directly back windows and closes GTA San Andreas when I campaign it (it will petite do the like for other games ...) Meanwhile, it can at least play a small.Thank you.

The HD4870 is a great production, save for 80euros + Up to functioning. The just advice is do not accept other than ASUS or MSI and assure GIGABYTE. Otherwise yes you can accept troubles with your card, now with my HD4870 and the most recent drivers properly configured all I get him to cough up a 800 FPS on COD4: No and yes.Accept the time to config.

You demend to assure the System necessities for Sapphire Radeon HD 4870. Since Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 sytem necessity is 500 Watt or Greater Power Supply with 2 75W 6 pin PCI Express power connectors advocated, 600 Watt oven and 6 pin connectives for ATI CrossFireX engineering in dual manner.

The ATI 4870 consumes 310 watts to burn, and approximately 170 in idle. So you're dead with this: (Accept 700 Watts! If you'll be beneficial promote! (considerably hopefully) and as we distinguished you not no name, or worse! I'll say no more, You handled to set fire to a PC accepting tested. The CG fan is very noisy! And often turn to max and only efficacy, not wonder. Seeking more if you can alter.

The trouble for the hard disk repel 4890 cards is a trouble Vaporx a power supply to a series on the HD 4890 and not the PC power supply. Attention should know that a diet "no name" 460 W will be less effectual than a diet with a yield of 430 W. 80 +.