Thread: 6 GB/s HHD on 3 GB/s RAID controller

Wondering what type of show difference I'd see in a RAID 0 set up using 2 x Western Digital Caviar Black WD1002FAEX 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal HDD -Bare Drive over 2 x SAMSUNG Spin point F3 HD502HJ 500GB 7200 RPM 16MB hoard SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" interior Hard Drive -Bare force on this Mob ASUS run riot III Gene LGA 1366 Intel X58 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 Micro ATX Intel Motherboard The CASHE is obviously better. I'm extra so wonder if the 6 GB/s would be senseless on that Mobo. I'm sure I recognize the answer, but I'd rather corroborate with someone who know wtf they're chatting about. Worth it to purchase a SATA III organizer for those HDD?

6gbps is backwards similar in temperament with 3bgps, AFAIK no traditional HDD even in raid can wet through a sata3 interface.

you are accurate, no hard drive resolve get close to 3Gb/s (375MB/s), even more than a few in RAID0.The caviar black 1TB has additional cache as they are larger drives, twofold the ability of the Samsung drives, and are earlier than the 500GB Samsung F3 is. Noticeably so, no, but it is. If I had to pick, I would take the WD drives, but not for the tempo, but for capacity.

you will actually require the 10000RPM to sort of have an have an effect on the length of with 6gb, i contain underneath and it works pretty well. Assuming 150MB/s is good. Between my Raptor in addition to my additional hard drives. i get a burst to approximately 350 for a few second, and since i more often than not transfer little files like 2-3 GB the move takes incredibly little time. But i would have the same opinion by means of Aastii on all his point. Especially the last one about SSD, it will be good!!!