Panda Internet Security 2010 finished eighth in the overall our 2010 summary of the security suite. Kit includes all the basic functions, as well as some additional, as 2 GB online backup and the ability to protect USB devices. Despite the wealth of functions, its detection of unknown this malicious program is not responding.

Panda interface is more complicated than necessary will be using various combinations of these tabs and grouped points, which makes it confusing at first glance. Nevertheless, Configuration settings can easily get lost, but simply one click away from the main screen. Anti-spam feature adds a toolbar and a spam folder Outlook and Outlook Express. His backup functions can return up by file type (eg, photos, office documents, or Internet favorites) or selected folders or drives, as well as you can backup to a backup service Panda. Parental controls require an account for each person; logging in, you activate the security set for that
rights.

In our tests, Panda did a good job of cleaning infections. He found all active infections at our test PC, provided 93 percent of inert infections, and completely remove all files and registry changes to 33 percent of all infections. But Panda only mediocre to identify and clean rootkits. He found 93 percent of active rootkits, and 80 percent inactive rootkits. It was able To completely remove only 87 percent of this particular cautious malware. Our top performers were found and remove all rootkits.

Panda to detect new, unknown threats on the basis of both they behave on a computer that is not impressive. He found 73 percent of our sample, 53 percent blocked, and removes 33 percent. This is an area in hot PC security; as well called zero-day attacks are becoming more frequent. The best performers managed to block more than 90 percent threat, but Norton scored a perfect 100 percent in this category.

In detecting malware using traditional signature files Panda was the second best showing, with 99.8 per cent level of detection, hair for 99.9 per cent in McAfee detection rate. This means that Panda should be effective when it detects malware older - but since new malware Outbreaks occur so often, traditional signature-based detection is less important than it was before. Of all the test suites, Panda slower download time most, our test system took 54.58 seconds to load with Panda in the kit is installed, or 8.6 seconds longer than Speed Dial for download, Eset Smart Security 4. Slowness is not insisted, with Panda with a minimum resistance in common tasks such as copying or creating files in Microsoft Office. The scanning speed is greatly

slower than average; Panda took 5 minutes, 30 seconds Scan 4.5GB of data-access scanning tests, which show how quickly the program can scan files when they to open or save to disk. Speed Dial Scan completed the test in 2 minutes, 51 seconds.

Panda Internet Security does some things very well - how to detect malware using traditional signature Based methods - but in order to challenge the conventional applicants, its Internet Security Suite must do generally better, especially in the behavior scan tests.