+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Higher FSB problem

  1. #1
    Erick waugh is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    74
    Rep Power
    3

    Default Higher FSB problem

    Hello everybody, I was able to achieve a cost horror 400x8 FSB. I tried with 1.35 Vcore, vDIMM 2 v 0.5 and up to the MCH and FSB but not me.... boot the pc goes into a loop where after 3 or 4 failed attempts is that the BIOS is reset.

    My pc is an E4300 @ 3 GHz now, Gigabyte P35 DS3P mother and 2 * 1024 mb GEIL DDR2 800 MHz (5-5-5-15 borne from 1.8 to 2.2 v).

    What am I doing wrong? What values should I go up to get a stable 3.2 GHz (400x8)?

    We thank you.

  2. #2
    Isaac Johnson is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    82
    Rep Power
    3

    Default

    200 MHz is not whether those who want to raise big difference.

    Hang the PCIe to 100?

    By memos should not have problems, perhaps by source, disable C1E and EIST.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    72
    Rep Power
    3

    Default

    Should further increase the Vcore and MCH, while you do not increase the T º is all OK. While not touching the ram voltage.

    What heat sink are you?

    According to the published image, this below the normal voltage of Vcore ... Send a SS CPUz on the reports tab.

  4. #4
    Erick waugh is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    74
    Rep Power
    3

    Default

    Thanks for responding.

    Well, I tell them, I guess it has to be the micro because there is no way to achieve stability as Ortho’s when the microphone to upload:
    FSB: 400 x 8 = 3.2 GHz
    Vcore: 1.4
    VDIMM: 2.1
    VMCH: +0.2
    VFSB: +0.2

    Even 375x8 remains unstable. Another thing that surprised me is that his mother just to try put a Vcore of 1.6, 2.2 and +0.3 memos to the other voltages and I could not even start.... I really do not understand my previous P5B Deluxe did a max FSB of 411x9 unstable here and even got to that with a more modern chipset.

    Anyway ... the experiences I have read I think this is just my own problem constraints E4300; do 3 GHz is easy ... perhaps possible to believe some 3.2 ~ 1.38 to 1.35 Vcore.

    Greetings.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2010, 06:53 AM
  2. Using higher monitor resolutions in safe mode
    By Edgar Boucher in forum Windows XP
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-19-2010, 09:35 AM
  3. Atom 2 platform comes with a higher graphics performance
    By adolf456 in forum Latest Hardware News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-15-2009, 08:24 AM
  4. Radeon HD 5870 has a higher clock frequencies directly from the factory
    By Kenneth Rasmussen in forum Latest Hardware News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-19-2009, 09:40 AM
  5. Tcase higher than core temps?
    By Leya Jovena in forum Overclocking
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-01-2009, 10:37 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
SEO by SubmitEdge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48