Thread: Ineffective to open programs on slave repel.

Hey,I had exclusive 40GB IDE hardened repel in my machine. But then I upgraded my hard repel to 80GB SATA. Erstwhile I did that I then set the IDE to slave because I desired to utilize it for store use. I then re-installed Windows XP on the SATA but the enslaved IDE which I had prefabricated relieve has a reproduce of windows on it. Now the problem that I am tackling is that I cannot admittance any programs stored on the IDE. When I try to move a information I get whatever type of a DLL fault.

The mark you made that you had reinstalled Windows XP on the SATA but the servile IDE which you prefab yet has a reduplicate of windows is not real right for me. You retributory cannot operate programs on a variouse Windows position from a unlike set up. The registry entries, files and few opposite files wanted to run a programme all lay within the operative method where the programs are set up and they can exclusive run from within that special place. If you are disagreeable to run apps on your secondment IDE locomote then I don't feel suchlike you are utilizing if for storage resolve.

I have one much statement to this trouble and I believe that it testament work pleasant .What you can do is you can icon the old repulse to the fresh road and everything module manipulate. But I conceive that the top abstraction is that you already set up a fresh OS then you status to reinstall entire of your programs and depute over the material files from the old route. Also one more matter which is rattling simplex locomote and then you can accession the assemblage simulate it and then exchange repels.

Hello Friends,I haven't proven out the answer that have been gives still but instrument certainly try those out. But ripe now I have hand my password manager on the IDE repel and I desire to get the passwords sanction. But as you have explicit that I should icon the former mean to the fresh move, but if I individual the saucer then module it put the image on the first repel and present this cipher the trouble?

Thanks..