Comparatively affordable drives such as the Kingston SSDNowV+ were never proposed to be state-of-the-art; rather they did a excellent job of popularizing the technology by more accessible costing, along with promote kits to modify the job of substituting inner drives, bundling outer drive enclosures and software.


Standing proud just at the top of the company’s rate though is a formidable-appearing flagship example, the Kingston HyperX SSD. And this slab of memory does promise the type of function to blow still the fussiest of enthusiast’s socks off.


Between the standout specifications we see touted for the Kingston HyperX SSD 240GB are sequential reads of 555MB/s and writes of 510MB/s. Those forms are so close to the evaluated function of another drive we currently tried, the Patriot Memory Wildfire 240GB, with its 559/508 MB each second recorded solution for read and writes.


If those advertised and evaluated solution for the competing drives appear same, it is because they share the similar button technology.


Name: kingston_hyperx_ssd_550.jpg Views: 14 Size: 30.7 KB

While the provenance of Patriot Memory’s NAND flash is not numbered, we conceive it to be Toshiba 25nm MLC type. The Kingston HyperX SSD 240GB here is told to be utilizing Intel 25nm MLC NAND flash.


But the excellent determine on real managing arrives from the SSD controller. Together drives assume perfectly the similar processor, the SandForce SF2281.


As such, it carries our standard caveat regarding producers’ favoured solution versus real speeds: the SandForce controller utilizes a quick compression/decompression DSP to accelerate its information transfers and thereby hit those effective velocities.


This method may profit sure actual-world documents such as system dll and plist documents, content files and spreadsheets; but these are small documents, equated to the video and music and ISO pictures that most demand and should recognize these scorching serial read/write transfers.


Such media documents and disk pictures are not readily compressible any more than they already are, for example by MPEG or JPEG loss compression coding systems. The information method within these documents is rather random, so they do not squash down similar to the continuous 0s or 1s data sets favored through many synthetic benchmark applications.