Thread: Overclocking E4400

I tell them an e4400 and I need help. Have the truth of the matter know, and I got to 3.2 GHz with this process. The problem is asking me q very high voltages (1.47v), which raises the temperature too much (about 70 ° in Vista, in XP 68 or 69).

The downside is 2.0; this process makes it bottleneck. To demonstrate that situation, did a mini review with the game grid. Personally think the differences are between a remarkable speed and other. Then attach a graphic:

Well, that would, me help and hope to get a stable overclock.

Heated to buy a cooler that thing or a turbine, or something is not so noisy, you said it yourself, if the problem is the temperature, as cool looking because if you're not willing to spend not overclocked as this is the option without having to upgrade parts, understand.

I have a blue orb II and now I buy a tube of arctic silver 5.

Achievements see if temp ... I doubt I will ask both voltages

Well, if the original clock is 2.0 and 3.2 is what you have on more than 50% 60% to be exact. This overclocked is obviously you are too demanding and becomes very unstable, hence the need to stabilize voltage stops, works well for the thing, I do not handling a lot, just as needed voltage.

Hi

I think it is enough, there was a poll asking the percentage of overclock, while 60% is pretty good, if put another cooling system, I like 2.8 is not bad.

For me is that temperature, if you end the programs that the measure is quite deceptive, because most of the time they hand the temperature of the TCAS, which would be under the processor or in general (which should not pass 65 °), but not delivered correctly the temperature of the nuclei separately, according to the specification of the Intel 'Always' is between 12 and 20 degrees above the temperature of the TCAS.
Therefore:
The TCAS processor or temperature reading 65 °, mean that alone would be close to 85 degrees, so it is recommended that TCAS is kept under 60 °, which in no case the nuclei move from 76 ° ~ 80 °, to keep an acceptable range where stability is maintained in the system.

Greetings!

1.47v, it does not ask you too, for asking 3200mhz is normal between 1.40vy 1.50v if you went stepping processor (which are the majority), I actually asked for 3200mhz but 1.42V then starts to climb but rather the voltage, but it is completely normal, are the privileged few who touches that process a voltage of 3200 or under the Stock 1.40vy kept low voltages to rise further, is hopefully not something more on the other hand there are other process not even get to 3000Mhz with 1.50v or plane come down some more fsb wall ..

I believe this will continue to play another week with the voltages and fsb... me buy an artic silver 5 ... and I hope I get a bit temp... you think the mini review? .. Actually did to demonstrate the existence of DDE bottle neck, and the usefulness of the overclock.