Thread: Overclock problem

Hello, I recently bought an x2 5000 black edition and I enthusiastically their ability to overclock. Well, I saw a review that hardware did and brought it to 3.2GHz with 1.4v which was stable and without the extremes.

Anyway, I did the same on my pc (in my signature) and the 2 weeks I started having problems: when you turn off the pc and sometimes neither party. Well, you get to 3.1 GHz with stock voltage and just a short while ago my computer refused to boot; I had to reset the bios.

Now, I have seen that in the bios CPU voltage is not exactly 1.3 varies between 1296 and 1344 which makes me think that these fluctuations do my overclock unstable. I do not know if the fault is my source (HEC WINPOWER to 550W) or my main board is an MSI K9N Platinum.

The truth does not overclock nearly anything, just theory. Nor on the money I do not want to experiment, like a lot my hardware. What do you recommend? Upload voltage? I have only changed the multiplier to 13x (stock) to 15.5x with 1.3V.

Thank you.

Hi

Are the reports are configured how? They are usually because of something oc.

When I was with the multiplier to 16x were running at 800MHz which is its normal speed, now are at 700 and p ** o. It is a corsair xms2. These memos have them done 4 months old and my CPU (an x2 4400).

Hello

The theme of the voltage is on, each case is different, just let the frequency you want and go up little by little, until you are stable, and / or temperature is not much lift.

The problem that is giving you is the source of power is not stable layers start the beginning (for that reason the computer is turned on)

The reason is the vga q is asking a lot of amperage (you can verify that the source is at the moment ... doing not want to turn off and connect the power cable and turn on the source).

I recommend increasing the Vcore to 1.6v (not be afraid to burn or something. no such thing exists. q unless we are talking about processors 10 years ago.) and after that go up to 3.2GHz.

All this looking for a source that has more amperage on the +12 v lines.

We're saying that what the source is limited, and tell apart up the Vcore, the source will not be able to lift, if 1.30 is not able to be stable, it will be less with 1.6. And do not think they say that a process does not burn to raise the Vcore, finally we know that for many if not cared for any t º process may fall in battle, either by raising the FSB or Vcore, albeit ago 10 years ago or this year.

You should try to acquire a source of stability in the lines.

True, the temperature is used to establish that Vcore, since at lower temperature, less voltage is needed to keep the system stable. But let's say the time also makes his own, and I would not for example my e2140 to 2v within 10 years.

The problem is not the Vcore assigns to CPU. Is the source that is not layers of the entire team? If you want to reach 3.2GHz q will raise the Vcore. 1.30 to 1.60 of the increase (exp by itself) is not more than 10 degrees now if you have the most to the temp 50 degrees... will climb to 60. Would be a bearable temperature in what they say to raise the Vcore a burning CPU or FBS... these totally wrong. Today, plaques and cpu are protecting you avoid turning on if the temperature crosses l limit to know that nobody ever burned a cpu (unless you've been putting the heat sink)

The other day I get a pc where the sink had been installed with the plastic .. You start Windows, but restarts ... The temperature in the bios was very high. Installed it correctly and so far so good.

A socket formerly in the range of higher Vcore achieves some change to the physical pleasure... and leave a Sempron CPU achieves to 2500mhz. but that still need 2.10vcore for that cpu was use both temperature was high. Installed by a volcano 12... And temperature stabilized... 2 years using it as well... then sold it...

The important thing always MHz upload and Vcore when the temperature ... if you manage to dissipate heat when you can use Vcore MHz need to achieve the result.

Greetings