Thread: Need help with overclocking

Hi, I would like to help me see if I have some doubts with respect to a jar that I put together, it would be as follows:

- OCZ SLI-Ready 2GB (2 x 1GB) DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) OCZ2N800SR2GK
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400 + Brisbane AM2 SOCKET 1MB BOX
- Asus M2N-E Socket / nForce 570 Ultra/DDR2/SATA2/AM2
- ECS N9600GT-512MX-P Geforce 9600GT 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI express
- Cabinet Spider SR3 Gamer Source 520W
- Western Digital WD2500AAKS 250GB SATA2 7200rpm 16MB
- Asus DRW-2014L1T Light Scribe 20X Double Layer SATA DVD + /-RW

That's what I have so far, I have more silver than for putting it: ((350k) My questions would be;

- How can Overclock it to the jar, of course safely and without forcing too much?
- Far more silver jar I work a lot more that?
- Okay that configuration me or something? Could advise on the matter if the lies?

That would be, thank you very much for your prompt attention and cooperation.

Hello

Try to get a CPU to reduce the biggest bottleneck, as oc its a 15-20% sure you can do.

Hello

I think it is okay cool estimate, so if you could check any other brand of hard disk as an alternative because WD have not gone very well to say, any cheeked Hitachi or Seagate.

Cool, hey could be that CPU? That is the bottle neck? Not a lot more expensive.

With respect to the video card, between 4 and seen:
- ECS N9600GT-512MX-P GeForce 9600GT 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI express
- Cod 10006 MSI V112-100 RADEON HD3850 T2D512E OC PCIE16X 512MB
- Cod 11,211 Foxconn GeForce 9600GT PCIE16X SLI DX10 512MB
and
- EAH3850/G/HTDI/256M ASUS Radeon HD 3850 256MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI

in relation to price, performance and durability ... oh and obviously Overclock

Thanks for all goats, I tell them there as I was burning!

The bottleneck occurs when the CPU is very small compared to the video board, reducing the performance in games. Choose an AMD CPU that is slightly larger than that, a 4600 or 4800, but only to be able to get juice to the video card; the pc is not that why you go wrong.

The video board, I recommend the 9600gt, any of the 2 is good, but I think I'll give least oc. The HD3850 was very good for a month and a half, two months, but are somewhat overvalued now out of the 9600gt.

I have several computers armed with that brand of disc, and relatively reliable, and many here would say the same. Hitachi WD is steak but not despise.

As to this quote, however, will have only a slight bottleneck. AMD to avoid bottleneck at have 3GHz process, which can easily achieve your process.

Can easily reach 3GHz with this process, without requiring too much? Is more or recommend a more Brisbane?

Otherwise, the video cards listed above, is the overclock gives me more confident?

With the plate I can get to good levels of Overclock?

Hi

You can easily reach 3GHz if your motherboard will allow it. If they are very limited in oc do not think you can go very far.

Something to keep in mind, when assembled with IDE WD, there was always conflict between the CD and the disc if hi he same tube, the solution was always the cd in cable select and slave disc, I never knew why.

No provision in the amount, no matter good, now I doubt my jar with the video cards, gamers are dry you would say that is the best?

– ECS Geforce 8600GT 512MB DVI / HDTV PCI-Express
- Cod 10040 SAPPHIRE ATI RADEON HD3650 PCIE16X DX10 512MB
- T / VIDEO GeCube Radeon X2600PRO GE 512MB DDR2 PCI-E
- Video HD2600 PCIE 512MB GDDR3 XT
- HIS Hightech H165PRQ512N-R Radeon X1650PRO 512MB 128-bit GDDR2 P
- T / VIDEO GeCube ATI X1650 512MB HM 1GB PCIe
- Video HD2600 PCIE 256MB GDDR3 XT
- Video PCIE HD2600 PRO 256MB GDDR2
- Cod 11214 SAPPHIRE ATI RADEON HD3470 PCIE16X DX10 DDR3 256MB
- T / VIDEO GeCube ATI X1650 256MB HM 1GB PCIe

The other thing, it was reading some forums on here and say that this type of cards (the two 1eras) do not give good yields despite having 512mg RAM, reports given by the core bit and slow process, q it does not move q well memos.

The other spoke of a wide bandwidth, I assume that the larger the width of intern faster information transfer, but not where to get this information.

In the end the card that was recommended:

[B] 256MB/128bit DDR2 ECS 8600GT

Greetings.

Discard all 512mb, best of all on that list is the 2600xt, then after the 3650 and 8600GT, the X1650 would be back.

2600xt both have the same speed in his memoirs, the problem is you're paying more for something they may never use in their entirety.

Never in its entirety?

Well then I'll stay with the Sapphire HD2600 XT PCIE 256MB GDDR3 ... This takes you to the top all others?

Okay all, thank you very much.

Not even in the Crysis board video calls over 256mb at 1280x1024 and above these resolutions, the game becomes unplayable, this happens with many other games, why unnecessary 512mb plate is medium and low.

To pay more, I mean that the 2600xt 512MB is the same as 256, the only difference is the price, so it's your decision, I would not pay for that difference more memory almost useless.

Thank you buddy, I skip a last annotation in the following comparisons show the HD2600XT 8600GT, ATI wins this second Core clock, memory clock, memory bandwidth and flops, while q ahead of ATI NVIDIA Shader Clock, pixel and texture fill rate fell rate. Below this are shown more details, but what strikes me is that said that the HD2600XT comes with GDDR4, okay that? Because all that is seen and GDDR3.

Thank you very much for everything man, helped me a lot, I go for the HD2600XT.

Otherwise, within the same in the list of possible brands to buy, the sale is more GCUBE Core and clock, sold here by that?

Greetings.

I have no idea, just come here to Argentina, and perhaps some of the Sapphire Asus.

The 8600GT gets to fight the 2600xt, but tends to lose more times. There is a 2600xt GDDR4, but it is somewhat difficult to find. I think they sold a here, I think that Negron had a GDDR4 for sale, you can browse and ask your board has little airtime, so you should have no problems.

The pixel fill rate and determined so to speak, the torque of a video board, while wide shaders and memory would be something like the horsepower (power), if not understood.

The 2600xt has 120 shaders, with the GPU to 800MHz giving a capacity of 96000 (800x120) shader operations, while the NVIDIA with 32 shaders and shader clock to 1180 is about 37760 (1180x32) shader operations, these values are estimates and were removed from the page because only serve to further plates, not the new (when it differed from pixel shader vertex shader).