I executed my test set up with CPU at 2.45GHz with a 350MHz FSB and utilized dividers to keep RAM as close to default as possible for first test, and as close to its maximum at every respective timing set.

• Over clocked Test Setup

* Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.45GHz
* 975X @ 266MHz
* Stock: 1:1 @ 3-2-2-8 (533MHz DDR2)
* 975X @ 350MHz
* Setup 1: 4:3 @ 3-2-2-8 (525MHz DDR2)
* Setup 2: 1:1 @ 3-2-2-1 (700MHz DDR2)
* Setup 3: 4:5 @ 4-3-2-1 (875MHz DDR2)

Fairly impressive results, particularly when overclocked, with top benches far exceeding stock results, supporting my hypothesis that this memory is designed for overclockers. A remarkable oddity is Everest Read speed on Setup 1 which I confirmed with subsequent benches. Why was it lower than bench with similarly clocked memory and a lower FSB? Probably it was divider used in Setup 1 that harms the score. Also, the Everest Latency on Setup three being weaker than latency on Setup 2 shows effects of using an asynchronous ratio.