Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Which card cavity AM3 furnish better support for Windows 2000.

  1. #1
    Madelynn lucila is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    199
    Rep Power
    2

    Default Which card cavity AM3 furnish better support for Windows 2000.

    Hello guys, I recognize that anything that has to do with digital corrects management does not operate with Win2k, but I was wondering which card socket AM3 gives "better enough" support for Win2K in terms of woods. In few cases there is easy no Win2k wood download present, and do not know if the installer now barfs on Win2k systems, or you could decompress controllers separately so that almost.

  2. #2
    Berna Edelweiss is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    196
    Rep Power
    2

    Default

    Hello according to my knowledge windows 2000 is out of date. ATI/AMD doesn't assert it to any more extent. Even if you require to detect about this then you can look it on net. I am sure that you will get right solution about your question.

  3. #3
    Polidoro Rancul is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    193
    Rep Power
    2

    Default

    Thanks you for your fast response on my query, but I refuse to let the marketeers on their knees earlier M $ to select my OS for me. It seems that there are platefuls with AMD chips 7xx series yet present that give fast access to memory and processors that's what I'm actually concerned in.

  4. #4
    Deodato Daryl is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    193
    Rep Power
    2

    Default

    I gladly manage for an AM3 board minus onboard video if you gave me access to a quicker memory. Possibly I am concerned for not anything. Could it be that whoppin 6meg large L3 cache gives the greatest improvement in speed reference? I do not be acquainted with how much would be achieved by the combination of L3 cache, more high-speed memory in the actually world.

  5. #5
    Joana Egia is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    187
    Rep Power
    2

    Default

    Isn't it enhanced to trim your available system utilized for what Windows 2000 likes most fantabulous, office employment and meshworking possibly, and adds a separate machine intended for media managing, gaming and such other things? I visualize this would quantity to not as much of money and work and obscurity. What’s your view about this?

  6. #6
    Gartzen Egiarte is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    182
    Rep Power
    2

    Default

    My trouble right now is easy to locate any AM3 motherboard with any chipset woods for Win2k. I hate activation / "phoning home" to MS, so I've avoided upgrading to Windows XP. I recognize that XP Pro gave me the support I have and the nuclei of most any chipset. Looks like it could go that way real better value, but do not recognize how ugly it would put a machine OS on top of a server set up.

Similar Threads

  1. Absolute Audio Recorder is not cavity in Windows 7
    By MyersGray in forum Windows 7/2000/NT
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-20-2010, 04:17 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-25-2009, 07:51 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-30-2009, 04:44 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-24-2009, 07:20 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-30-2008, 03:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SEO by SubmitEdge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48