If one takes into account all the feedback from users of Windows Vista (as a negative or positive), a company aimed at Microsoft, can a 7 - Windows version, I considered the best of all so far?

Vista seems a mystery to many. Sales still remain at a high level, and users of the system and not so happy with the latest proposal from Microsoft. I should also note that while ordinary users of computers, as well as companies waited for the emergence of SP1 update for the system, it's becoming clear that this update is not enough to halt a growing flow of increasingly negative feedback. If the truth of the fact that the Microsoft Windows tries to release as soon as possible, so that it has been installed on many computers, it is possible to think that Microsoft does not accept poor reviews seriously and is going to deal with bugs in the system at a later date.

If the company Microsoft listened to this feedback, the company would be quite such a clear idea of what the users think about this system and that it does not suit, which in turn would give the programmers and project managers clearly an idea of what should be the next version of the program.

So, if the company is Microsoft really would listen to the views of users, which would be Windows Vista? First, it may be worthwhile to first Microsoft to change the minimum requirements to the system. Vista works very well on computers with good the hardware, but when the "iron" has been not as good, then immediately appear problems that are hard to overlook. Thus, in order to ensure that the system was really good, Microsoft is a sufficiently flexible OS that she worked at a wide range of computers - not only on expensive, innovative models, but at the cost of the system from 200 to 250 dollars.

Secondly, it would be a good idea to change the system for controlling user accounts or get rid of it. If you podkovany enough technically, the system will not cause any problems, but if not, change everything at once, and eventually you are using an operating system that refuses to work as you would like.

Another stumbling block is a software and hardware compatibility. These parameters must be kept to a minimum in the next release, if Microsoft no longer wants to hear such a number of complaints from users. Manufacturers should be interested in the development of new drivers, rather than wait for users to the fact that they will ask themselves this simply because such they do not have drivers. Next is a performance. Think about this characterization, and you will understand why Vista is not so much losing as compared to X from Linux or Mac, and Windows XP. Benchmarks show that the ability to put XP to Vista blade. Even updated Vista SP1 can do the same with the upgrade to XP - SP3, and the upgrade makes the system work even better.

A lot of criticism is of the same user interface and Windows Vista. Of course, the new interface looks very, very attractive, but this does not mean that this interface is easier to use and better. In fact, many users complain that the new interface is not as clear and understandable to-use interface compared to Windows Vista. Merely changing the design does not mean that things became better.

And, of course, do not forget about the driver. With each passing day, Microsoft collects more and more information on the critical errors in the system, but we can still see that the drivers are of the same mistakes as last year. Either company Microsoft simply does not use it, or it very slowly comes to producers. Good drivers - is the key to seamless, secure and fast operating system, but has drivers for OS Vista, with whom I have encountered, worth nothing.